Opinii

To understand how powerful the Israeli lobby is in this country, venerable Senator J. William Fulbright told CBS Face the Nation on April 15, 1973,

"Israel controls the U.S. Senate. The Senate is subservient, much too much; we should be more concerned about U.S. interests rather than doing the bidding of Israel. The great majority of the Senate of the U.S. - somewhere around 80% - is completely in support of Israel; anything Israel wants; Israel gets. This has been demonstrated time and again, and this has made [foreign policy] difficult for our government."

La 2008-05-27 23:52:04, Uliu_Roman a scris:

> To understand how powerful the Israeli lobby is in this country,
> venerable Senator J. William Fulbright told CBS Face the Nation on
> April 15, 1973,
>
> "Israel controls the U.S. Senate. The Senate is subservient, much too
> much; we should be more concerned about U.S. interests rather than
> doing the bidding of Israel. The great majority of the Senate of the
> U.S. - somewhere around 80% - is completely in support of Israel;
> anything Israel wants; Israel gets. This has been demonstrated time
> and again, and this has made [foreign policy] difficult for our
> government."
--------------------
I`auzi, ce le tot zice Fulbright, inca din 1973 ...
si nimeni nu-i asculta cintecul, cuvintele nu`s adevarate ...

corect e ``whatever Lola wants, Lola gets !``
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqNLZ_Wx_wA&NR=1

La 2008-05-27 23:52:04, Uliu_Roman a scris:

> To understand how powerful the Israeli lobby is in this country,
> venerable Senator J. William Fulbright told CBS Face the Nation on
> April 15, 1973,
>
> "Israel controls the U.S. Senate. The Senate is subservient, much too
> much; we should be more concerned about U.S. interests rather than
> doing the bidding of Israel. The great majority of the Senate of the
> U.S. - somewhere around 80% - is completely in support of Israel;
> anything Israel wants; Israel gets. This has been demonstrated time
> and again, and this has made [foreign policy] difficult for our
> government."
Intr-adevar !...Un citat relevant !...Acest individ (Democrat) , a fost mentorul lui Bill Clinton...Fulbright (sau cum noi il alintam Halfbright) , a fost unul din liderii din partidul Democrat ,care s-au opus cu inversunare The Civil Rights Act ,din 1964....Act in care garanteaza drepturi egale minoritatilor de culoare din america...Nu sunt surprins , ca tu il citezi pe acest segregationist si rasist...Si ca intotdeauna rasismul merge mana in mana cu antisemitismul....Nu sunt surprins deloc de afinitatile tale uliule...In rest , stim ca tu lupti pt. libertate si democratie...ah! Da...si pt. crestinism....

La 2008-05-27 23:52:04, Uliu_Roman a scris:

> "Israel controls the U.S. Senate.

israel, este aliatul traditional al americii in pensinsula araba (hot-spot!) nimic mai mult.

eu mai degraba cred ca US e addicted to industria militara (daca am dreptate, atunci US nu este controlata de israel, ci viceversa)

war is the parent of armies...or viceversa!
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/spending.htm
http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/Spending.asp

La 2008-05-28 02:21:30, Mircea1 a scris:

> La 2008-05-27 23:52:04, Uliu_Roman a scris:
>
> > "Israel controls the U.S. Senate.
>
> israel, este aliatul traditional al americii in pensinsula araba
> (hot-spot!) nimic mai mult.
>
> eu mai degraba cred ca US e addicted to industria militara (daca am
> dreptate, atunci US nu este controlata de israel, ci viceversa)
>
> war is the parent of armies...or viceversa!
> http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/spending.htm
> http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/Spending.asp
>
>
>
>
Site uri create de neo bolsevici . pt. neo bolsevici...cu scopul de a dezarma america...Daca tu crezi aceste bazaconii , atunci cum se face ca fortele armate imperialiste americane sunt over streched...Intr-un simplu conflict...Pana in 1992 , doctrina militara americana era aceea din cel deal doilea razboi mondial : Fortele armate imperialiste americane sa poate purta doua razboie majore simultane , pe fronturi diferite , si doua conflicte militare regionale (precum cel din iraq si afganistan) , toate , simultan si victorioase...O tara cu o adictie militara , nu ar avea aceasta problema...Compara procentul cheltuit de imperialistii agresivi americani , din produsl national brut , vizavi altor tari pasnice si democratice care nu au o adictie pt. industria militara....Daca sistemul imperialist american ,are o adictie militara , atunci de ce fortele armate imperialiste americane sunt VOLUNTARE si nu compulsorii , precum in pasnicile democratii adversare ?...Daca industria asta militara americana este atat de iesita de sub control , cum se face ca cei mai mari exportaori de arme , nave, submarine ,tancuri, artilerie, etc.,etc nu sunt imperialistii americani ?....Ma opresc aici cu aceste intrebari....Totusi se pare ca Realitatea , contrazice propaganda neo bolsevica cu care te hranesti...

La 2008-05-28 03:13:10, alamar a scris:

> Site uri create de neo bolsevici . pt. neo bolsevici...cu scopul de a
> dezarma america...Daca tu crezi aceste bazaconii , atunci cum se face
> ca fortele armate imperialiste americane sunt over streched...Intr-un
> simplu conflict...Pana in 1992 , doctrina militara americana era aceea
> din cel deal doilea razboi mondial :


pina in 92? eu as spune pina-n prezent! fascismul (nazistii, japonezii) urmatoarele 5 decade of redscare...iar acum the new scare: islamistii si teroristii. well done, viitorul este asigurat pt urmatoarele decade!

http://www.ziua.net/f.php?data=2008-05-28&thread=237898&id=53890#53890



>Fortele armate imperialiste
> americane sa poate purta doua razboie majore simultane , pe fronturi
> diferite , si doua conflicte militare regionale (precum cel din iraq
> si afganistan) , toate , simultan si victorioase...

asa deci te-ai decis pt varianta 2a (armatele sunt mamele razboiului?)


>Compara procentul cheltuit de
> imperialistii agresivi americani , din produsl national brut , vizavi
> altor tari pasnice si democratice care nu au o adictie pt. industria
> militara....


nu stiam ca US contribuie la BIPul global cu aprox 50% .
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/spending.htm


>Daca
> industria asta militara americana este atat de iesita de sub control ,
> cum se face ca cei mai mari exportaori de arme , nave, submarine
> ,tancuri, artilerie, etc.,etc nu sunt imperialistii americani ?

armata americana este cel mai mare cumparator de arme (din lume) this is a fact...si la o adica, se pot lua de mina cu "ceilalti"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7407631.stm
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/reuters/080523/world/international_clusterbombs_ireland_dc


>....Ma
> opresc aici cu aceste intrebari....Totusi se pare ca Realitatea ,
> contrazice propaganda neo bolsevica cu care te hranesti...

catelus cu parul cret, nice stuff !