Externe

guvernele din "lumea libera"-ei nu trebuie sa mai ocupe tzari,iau presa si invirt marionetele la conducere de ramii ametzit pe viatza ,adica un fel de turmentat= si numai atunci tzi"o baga peste tot si la misto cu musulmanii si rusi,ca se te abureasca cacialmat
Camataria in special cu guvernele a lasat lumea in sapa de lemn si e ocupatzia lor de baza

It was Israel, not Hamas, who broke the six-month peace truce

By Charles E. Carlson — MP3

The White House’s press release is exactly the same as the Zionist Israel position, blaming the victims. It is imperative that we know why. Here is the official Israeli line, directly from Washington:

“It was “completely unacceptable” for Hamas, which controls Gaza, to launch attacks on Israel after a truce lasting several months, said Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council. “These people are nothing but thugs, so Israel is going to defend its people against terrorists like Hamas that indiscriminately kill their own people.”

The reason the US Administration parrots Zionist Israel’s story is that there is a common agenda that calls for more war in the Middle East. As we have written for some years, ours is a war-based economy, and Israel plays a large part in it because the USA’s targeted enemy is Islam.

War, to those who direct our course from above and beyond presidential politics, is not about religion, but is a vehicle to force economic growth where there is now stagnation. Broader, bigger and more permanent wars is a part or the “Dilution Solution” planned to save our economy, much as World War II was thought by many to be a planned solution to the “Great Depression.”

We Hold These Truths opposes this policy, which will end only when citizens demand it.

The USA, also, uses Israel to further the war agenda. Israeli politicians willingly play their part in the US war schemes, that necessitates many secret meetings between the two. Israeli citizens will eventually be blamed for wars in the Middle East and could one day become the victims.

Zionist politicians have their own political reasons for the unreasonable brutality which has been discussed in the Arab press. Israel wants to regain political control over the Philistines, so to their way of thinking, Hamas must go. This writer uses the biblical “Philistine” in place of the popular “Palestinian” to emphasize that Arabs are the historic occupants of the land, and they presently do not even have a state. Paradoxically, they are like the unarmed David, a stateless people wondering in the land of the Philistines, but with the slingshot, versus Israel, the militarist Goliath. (more…)

La 2009-01-04 19:49:47, iobagul roman a scris:

> guvernele din "lumea libera"-ei nu trebuie sa mai ocupe tzari,iau
> presa si invirt marionetele la conducere de ramii ametzit pe viatza
> ,adica un fel de turmentat= si numai atunci tzi"o baga peste tot si
> la misto cu musulmanii si rusi,ca se te abureasca cacialmat
> Camataria in special cu guvernele a lasat lumea in sapa de lemn si e
> ocupatzia lor de baza
>

Vina cea mai mare este a celor tapiti, pentru ca sunt mai prosti. Evreii n-au facut altceva decat sa se foloseasca de aceasta oportunitate. Pai daca nici nemtii, francezii si englezii, americanii, toti ceilalti, n-au vazut ca evreii pun gologan peste gologan, din bisnita si camatarie, fara sa transpire, si devin extrem de bogati si de influenti, inseamna ca au fost batuti in cap si isi merita soarta. Nu-i vedeti pe americani (pulimea de acolo) ce naivi sunt si cum s-au umflat cu mancare chimizata ? Poti sa spui ca astia gandesc prea mult si ca ar fi ceva de capul lor ? Dar ce zici de esticii (romanii, bulgarii, ungurii, ...) care s-au napustit asupra fabricilor lor si le-au distrus, sau au privit pasivi, la indicatia "pretioasa" a unor jigodii platite de masonerie ? Taranii care au casunat pe dotarile de la CAP si au plecat cu usile si ferestrele in spinare, cu caruta cu caramizi, cu tractoarele si masinile agricole descompletate, se trag dintr-o rasa superioara ? Eu mai uit la o parte din rude, la vecinii de la bloc, la colegii de serviciu, si ii vad cat de animalici sunt. Nu se pot organiza superior pentru ca actioneaza instinctiv. Nu-i intereseaza binele comun, functionarea unor institutii, pentru ca nu se gandesc decat la ei. Astia pot fi condusi doar prin dictatura, de o elita, pentru ca sunt prosti, lasi, jigodii si nu se pot organiza in structuri sociale eficiente. Unii sunt atat de egoisti incat nici de copiii lor nu se ocupa (ma refer la educatie).