Externe

Definitzie : "Maritime piracy, according to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of 1982, consists of any criminal acts of violence, detention, or depredation committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or aircraft that is directed on the high seas against another ship, aircraft, or against persons or property on board a ship or aircraft. Piracy can also be committed against a ship, aircraft, persons, or property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any state, in fact piracy has been the first example of universal jurisdiction. term has been used to refer to raids across land borders by non-state actors. Nevertheless today the international community is facing many problems in bringing pirates to justice.[1]"

Avea marina israeliana juristdictzie asuora cargoului respectiv ?
Producetzi tzidulele va rog !

NU nu avea , deorece nu acesta era in aplele teritoriale si nu avea nici mandant desemnat in acest scop. Deci marina israelina a comis conform scriptelor internatzionale un act de piraterie sau dupa gust un act de razboi.

Ori o natziune "iubitorte de pace " ca Israleul nu pote comite act de razboi ca atare singura alta incadrere posibila disponibila respectivului act este act de piraterie.

In concluzie daca guvernul israleiean si armata israleiana nu poate fi judecat si condamnata pentru comiterea infratziunea de crime de razboi - actul de a comite neprovocat acte de razboi se inscrie la crime de razboi nu ne ramane decat o singur alta solutzie. Acte de piraterie. (ce inseamna "provocat" se poate gasi in conventziuile internatzionale si intotdeuna se refera la deschirea prelabila a operatziunilor militare de catre celalata parate )

Concluzia ISRALELUL ESTE O "NATZIUNE" DE PIRATZI iar restul lumii pote sa depuna marturie sa stindardul lor autentic dintotdeuna a fost si este este Jolie Rouge = Jolly Roger . SI TREBUIE TRATATZI CA ATARE .

Acuma alegerea le apartzine lor si numai lor ori au un guvern criminal de razboi ori sunt o natziune de piratzi

" Piracy is a war-like act committed by private parties (not affiliated with any government) that engaged in acts of robbery and/or criminal violence at sea. The term can include acts committed in other major bodies of water or on a shore. .... Piracy should be distinguished from privateering, which was a legitimate form of war-like activity by non-state actors, authorized by their national authorities, until this form of commerce raiding was outlawed in the 19th century."

De fapt toata lume astie ca Isralelul este corpul de "Privateers" desfasurat de USA in Orientul Mijlociu si cam atat, un cuib de banditzi aflatzi infara legii si care traisc in permanta stare de razboi cu TOZTI VECINII LOR existentza lor fiind garantata ca si in cazul restului de "Pirates Democarcy" de secol XVI exclusiv prin puterea sabie si teroarea tunului si atat. Pentru documetare luatzi de sevitzi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy#Pirate_Democracy

Acum intrebare intrebatoare NOI restul oare ce drepturai avem ca sa ne aparam de PIRATZI sau de ce nu de CRIMINALII DE RAZBOI ca George Warlord Bush & co si … la ce resurse putem recurge in acest scop ?
PS eu le prefer pe cele atomice care garanteaza imputzinarea daunatorilor asta desigur daca de lege si aplicarea ei nici nu poate fi vorba, n’asa ?

Hai, hai... stergeti spuma de la gura. Nu-i frumos sa te dai in spectacol!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

La 2009-11-05 05:11:41, laur a scris:

> Definitzie : "Maritime piracy, according to the United Nations
> Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of 1982, consists of any
> criminal acts of violence, detention, or depredation committed for
> private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or
> aircraft that is directed on the high seas against another ship,
> aircraft, or against persons or property on board a ship or aircraft.
> Piracy can also be committed against a ship, aircraft, persons, or
> property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any state, in fact
> piracy has been the first example of universal jurisdiction. term has
> been used to refer to raids across land borders by non-state actors.
> Nevertheless today the international community is facing many
> problems in bringing pirates to justice.[1]"
>
> Avea marina israeliana juristdictzie asuora cargoului respectiv ?
> Producetzi tzidulele va rog !
>
> NU nu avea , deorece nu acesta era in aplele teritoriale si nu avea
> nici mandant desemnat in acest scop. Deci marina israelina a comis
> conform scriptelor internatzionale un act de piraterie sau dupa gust
> un act de razboi.
>
> Ori o natziune "iubitorte de pace " ca Israleul nu pote comite act de
> razboi ca atare singura alta incadrere posibila disponibila
> respectivului act este act de piraterie.
>
> In concluzie daca guvernul israleiean si armata israleiana nu poate fi
> judecat si condamnata pentru comiterea infratziunea de crime de razboi
> - actul de a comite neprovocat acte de razboi se inscrie la crime de
> razboi nu ne ramane decat o singur alta solutzie. Acte de piraterie.
> (ce inseamna "provocat" se poate gasi in conventziuile internatzionale
> si intotdeuna se refera la deschirea prelabila a operatziunilor
> militare de catre celalata parate )
>
> Concluzia ISRALELUL ESTE O "NATZIUNE" DE PIRATZI iar restul lumii pote
> sa depuna marturie sa stindardul lor autentic dintotdeuna a fost si
> este este Jolie Rouge = Jolly Roger . SI TREBUIE TRATATZI CA ATARE
> .
>
> Acuma alegerea le apartzine lor si numai lor ori au un guvern criminal
> de razboi ori sunt o natziune de piratzi
>
> " Piracy is a war-like act committed by private parties (not
> affiliated with any government) that engaged in acts of robbery
> and/or criminal violence at sea. The term can include acts committed
> in other major bodies of water or on a shore. .... Piracy should be
> distinguished from privateering, which was a legitimate form of
> war-like activity by non-state actors, authorized by their national
> authorities, until this form of commerce raiding was outlawed in the
> 19th century."
>
> De fapt toata lume astie ca Isralelul este corpul de "Privateers"
> desfasurat de USA in Orientul Mijlociu si cam atat, un cuib de
> banditzi aflatzi infara legii si care traisc in permanta stare de
> razboi cu TOZTI VECINII LOR existentza lor fiind garantata ca si in
> cazul restului de "Pirates Democarcy" de secol XVI exclusiv prin
> puterea sabie si teroarea tunului si atat. Pentru documetare luatzi
> de sevitzi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy#Pirate_Democracy
>
> Acum intrebare intrebatoare NOI restul oare ce drepturai avem ca sa ne
> aparam de PIRATZI sau de ce nu de CRIMINALII DE RAZBOI ca George
> Warlord Bush & co si … la ce resurse putem recurge in acest
> scop ?
> PS eu le prefer pe cele atomice care garanteaza imputzinarea
> daunatorilor asta desigur daca de lege si aplicarea ei nici nu poate
> fi vorba, n’asa ?
>

in modul cel mai legal conform rez ONU 1737.


> La 2009-11-05 05:11:41, laur a scris:
>
> > Definitzie : "Maritime piracy, according to the United Nations
> > Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of 1982, consists of any
> > criminal acts of violence, detention, or depredation committed for
> > private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or
> > aircraft that is directed on the high seas against another ship,
> > aircraft, or against persons or property on board a ship or aircraft.
> > Piracy can also be committed against a ship, aircraft, persons, or
> > property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any state, in fact
> > piracy has been the first example of universal jurisdiction. term has
> > been used to refer to raids across land borders by non-state actors.
> > Nevertheless today the international community is facing many
> > problems in bringing pirates to justice.[1]"
> >
> > Avea marina israeliana juristdictzie asuora cargoului respectiv ?
> > Producetzi tzidulele va rog !
> >
> > NU nu avea , deorece nu acesta era in aplele teritoriale si nu avea
> > nici mandant desemnat in acest scop. Deci marina israelina a comis
> > conform scriptelor internatzionale un act de piraterie sau dupa gust
> > un act de razboi.
> >
> > Ori o natziune "iubitorte de pace " ca Israleul nu pote comite act de
> > razboi ca atare singura alta incadrere posibila disponibila
> > respectivului act este act de piraterie.
> >
> > In concluzie daca guvernul israleiean si armata israleiana nu poate fi
> > judecat si condamnata pentru comiterea infratziunea de crime de razboi
> > - actul de a comite neprovocat acte de razboi se inscrie la crime de
> > razboi nu ne ramane decat o singur alta solutzie. Acte de piraterie.
> > (ce inseamna "provocat" se poate gasi in conventziuile internatzionale
> > si intotdeuna se refera la deschirea prelabila a operatziunilor
> > militare de catre celalata parate )
> >
> > Concluzia ISRALELUL ESTE O "NATZIUNE" DE PIRATZI iar restul lumii pote
> > sa depuna marturie sa stindardul lor autentic dintotdeuna a fost si
> > este este Jolie Rouge = Jolly Roger . SI TREBUIE TRATATZI CA ATARE
> > .
> >
> > Acuma alegerea le apartzine lor si numai lor ori au un guvern criminal
> > de razboi ori sunt o natziune de piratzi
> >
> > " Piracy is a war-like act committed by private parties (not
> > affiliated with any government) that engaged in acts of robbery
> > and/or criminal violence at sea. The term can include acts committed
> > in other major bodies of water or on a shore. .... Piracy should be
> > distinguished from privateering, which was a legitimate form of
> > war-like activity by non-state actors, authorized by their national
> > authorities, until this form of commerce raiding was outlawed in the
> > 19th century."
> >
> > De fapt toata lume astie ca Isralelul este corpul de "Privateers"
> > desfasurat de USA in Orientul Mijlociu si cam atat, un cuib de
> > banditzi aflatzi infara legii si care traisc in permanta stare de
> > razboi cu TOZTI VECINII LOR existentza lor fiind garantata ca si in
> > cazul restului de "Pirates Democarcy" de secol XVI exclusiv prin
> > puterea sabie si teroarea tunului si atat. Pentru documetare luatzi
> > de sevitzi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy#Pirate_Democracy
> >
> > Acum intrebare intrebatoare NOI restul oare ce drepturai avem ca sa ne
> > aparam de PIRATZI sau de ce nu de CRIMINALII DE RAZBOI ca George
> > Warlord Bush & co si … la ce resurse putem recurge in acest
> > scop ?
> > PS eu le prefer pe cele atomice care garanteaza imputzinarea
> > daunatorilor asta desigur daca de lege si aplicarea ei nici nu poate
> > fi vorba, n’asa ?
> >
>
>

in modul cel mai legal si conform rez ONU 1701 care interzice furnizare de armament organizatiei Hezbollah.
>
>
> > La 2009-11-05 05:11:41, laur a scris:
> >
> > > Definitzie : "Maritime piracy, according to the United Nations
> > > Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of 1982, consists of any
> > > criminal acts of violence, detention, or depredation committed for
> > > private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or
> > > aircraft that is directed on the high seas against another ship,
> > > aircraft, or against persons or property on board a ship or aircraft.
> > > Piracy can also be committed against a ship, aircraft, persons, or
> > > property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any state, in fact
> > > piracy has been the first example of universal jurisdiction. term has
> > > been used to refer to raids across land borders by non-state actors.
> > > Nevertheless today the international community is facing many
> > > problems in bringing pirates to justice.[1]"
> > >
> > > Avea marina israeliana juristdictzie asuora cargoului respectiv ?
> > > Producetzi tzidulele va rog !
> > >
> > > NU nu avea , deorece nu acesta era in aplele teritoriale si nu avea
> > > nici mandant desemnat in acest scop. Deci marina israelina a comis
> > > conform scriptelor internatzionale un act de piraterie sau dupa gust
> > > un act de razboi.
> > >
> > > Ori o natziune "iubitorte de pace " ca Israleul nu pote comite act de
> > > razboi ca atare singura alta incadrere posibila disponibila
> > > respectivului act este act de piraterie.
> > >
> > > In concluzie daca guvernul israleiean si armata israleiana nu poate fi
> > > judecat si condamnata pentru comiterea infratziunea de crime de razboi
> > > - actul de a comite neprovocat acte de razboi se inscrie la crime de
> > > razboi nu ne ramane decat o singur alta solutzie. Acte de piraterie.
> > > (ce inseamna "provocat" se poate gasi in conventziuile internatzionale
> > > si intotdeuna se refera la deschirea prelabila a operatziunilor
> > > militare de catre celalata parate )
> > >
> > > Concluzia ISRALELUL ESTE O "NATZIUNE" DE PIRATZI iar restul lumii pote
> > > sa depuna marturie sa stindardul lor autentic dintotdeuna a fost si
> > > este este Jolie Rouge = Jolly Roger . SI TREBUIE TRATATZI CA ATARE
> > > .
> > >
> > > Acuma alegerea le apartzine lor si numai lor ori au un guvern criminal
> > > de razboi ori sunt o natziune de piratzi
> > >
> > > " Piracy is a war-like act committed by private parties (not
> > > affiliated with any government) that engaged in acts of robbery
> > > and/or criminal violence at sea. The term can include acts committed
> > > in other major bodies of water or on a shore. .... Piracy should be
> > > distinguished from privateering, which was a legitimate form of
> > > war-like activity by non-state actors, authorized by their national
> > > authorities, until this form of commerce raiding was outlawed in the
> > > 19th century."
> > >
> > > De fapt toata lume astie ca Isralelul este corpul de "Privateers"
> > > desfasurat de USA in Orientul Mijlociu si cam atat, un cuib de
> > > banditzi aflatzi infara legii si care traisc in permanta stare de
> > > razboi cu TOZTI VECINII LOR existentza lor fiind garantata ca si in
> > > cazul restului de "Pirates Democarcy" de secol XVI exclusiv prin
> > > puterea sabie si teroarea tunului si atat. Pentru documetare luatzi
> > > de sevitzi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy#Pirate_Democracy
> > >
> > > Acum intrebare intrebatoare NOI restul oare ce drepturai avem ca sa ne
> > > aparam de PIRATZI sau de ce nu de CRIMINALII DE RAZBOI ca George
> > > Warlord Bush & co si … la ce resurse putem recurge in acest
> > > scop ?
> > > PS eu le prefer pe cele atomice care garanteaza imputzinarea
> > > daunatorilor asta desigur daca de lege si aplicarea ei nici nu poate
> > > fi vorba, n’asa ?
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

iar faci klabuci la capete de oftica? Sterge-te la popu cu textele tale ca nu-s bune de altcev!

IL face tot ce trebuie pentru securitea tzarii, indiferent ce urla labagii VERZI ca tine shi BINE FACE!





La 2009-11-05 05:11:41, laur a scris:

> Definitzie : "Maritime piracy, according to the United Nations
> Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) of 1982, consists of any
> criminal acts of violence, detention, or depredation committed for
> private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or
> aircraft that is directed on the high seas against another ship,
> aircraft, or against persons or property on board a ship or aircraft.
> Piracy can also be committed against a ship, aircraft, persons, or
> property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any state, in fact
> piracy has been the first example of universal jurisdiction. term has
> been used to refer to raids across land borders by non-state actors.
> Nevertheless today the international community is facing many
> problems in bringing pirates to justice.[1]"
>
> Avea marina israeliana juristdictzie asuora cargoului respectiv ?
> Producetzi tzidulele va rog !
>
> NU nu avea , deorece nu acesta era in aplele teritoriale si nu avea
> nici mandant desemnat in acest scop. Deci marina israelina a comis
> conform scriptelor internatzionale un act de piraterie sau dupa gust
> un act de razboi.
>
> Ori o natziune "iubitorte de pace " ca Israleul nu pote comite act de
> razboi ca atare singura alta incadrere posibila disponibila
> respectivului act este act de piraterie.
>
> In concluzie daca guvernul israleiean si armata israleiana nu poate fi
> judecat si condamnata pentru comiterea infratziunea de crime de razboi
> - actul de a comite neprovocat acte de razboi se inscrie la crime de
> razboi nu ne ramane decat o singur alta solutzie. Acte de piraterie.
> (ce inseamna "provocat" se poate gasi in conventziuile internatzionale
> si intotdeuna se refera la deschirea prelabila a operatziunilor
> militare de catre celalata parate )
>
> Concluzia ISRALELUL ESTE O "NATZIUNE" DE PIRATZI iar restul lumii pote
> sa depuna marturie sa stindardul lor autentic dintotdeuna a fost si
> este este Jolie Rouge = Jolly Roger . SI TREBUIE TRATATZI CA ATARE
> .
>
> Acuma alegerea le apartzine lor si numai lor ori au un guvern criminal
> de razboi ori sunt o natziune de piratzi
>
> " Piracy is a war-like act committed by private parties (not
> affiliated with any government) that engaged in acts of robbery
> and/or criminal violence at sea. The term can include acts committed
> in other major bodies of water or on a shore. .... Piracy should be
> distinguished from privateering, which was a legitimate form of
> war-like activity by non-state actors, authorized by their national
> authorities, until this form of commerce raiding was outlawed in the
> 19th century."
>
> De fapt toata lume astie ca Isralelul este corpul de "Privateers"
> desfasurat de USA in Orientul Mijlociu si cam atat, un cuib de
> banditzi aflatzi infara legii si care traisc in permanta stare de
> razboi cu TOZTI VECINII LOR existentza lor fiind garantata ca si in
> cazul restului de "Pirates Democarcy" de secol XVI exclusiv prin
> puterea sabie si teroarea tunului si atat. Pentru documetare luatzi
> de sevitzi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy#Pirate_Democracy
>
> Acum intrebare intrebatoare NOI restul oare ce drepturai avem ca sa ne
> aparam de PIRATZI sau de ce nu de CRIMINALII DE RAZBOI ca George
> Warlord Bush & co si … la ce resurse putem recurge in acest
> scop ?
> PS eu le prefer pe cele atomice care garanteaza imputzinarea
> daunatorilor asta desigur daca de lege si aplicarea ei nici nu poate
> fi vorba, n’asa ?
>