Opinii

Si de aceea pensile trebuie sa fie de stat si nu o capusa sindicala pe intreprinderile destul de mari si de nefericit pozitionate astfel incat sa nu se poata ascunde de ele

De ce ? Pentru ca in focul luptei everything goes

In focul luptei un tax break oferit de stat ca sa atraga BMW este platit prin inchiderea unei fabrici intr-un stat care nu isi permite sa acorde o asemenea pleasca

In focul luptei un agreement anti-sindical si o decuplare de la plata pensiilor a unora insemna pur si simplu falimentarea intreprinderilor destul de vechi ca asa apuce sa produca si pensionari .

Adica sa fim clari daca voi alegetzi sa falimentatzi GM si Chrysler pentru ca ele platesc pensii cata vremne Toyoata , BMW, Honda si Nissan nu cred ca sustzinetzi un model economic vaibil .

Adica pe termen mediu si intr-o maniera revolutzionar / insurectzionara adica tipic luptei de clasa comuniste voi instigatzi ca fortzel ce au pus capastru sindical industrie auto americane sa procedeze similar cu industria auto straina si in general cu toata TOATA economia americana

Adica voi credetzi ca nu se mai poate naste o noua miscare roosveldiana care sa dea cu baronii furtului de Wall-Mart & co de pamant ?

Voi chiar credati ca ce-a mancat lupul e bun mancat si ce-a prostit propaganda asta vorba lui Alamar “...inelectuala si morala” e bun prostit . ca oadata instaurata dicataura lui “NO SPACE, NO CHOICE, NO JOBS” lumpenii nu se poate trezi si nu poate riposta cu NO LOGO asa cun fac deja in mo symbolic d ever-o 20 de ani incoace de la batalia de la Settle ?”

Eu nu cred eu nu cred ca mantra corporatziilr de azi o asa ma faca multa vreme purici “Branded Work: Hobbies, Not Jobs”

“Most of the large employers in the service sector manage their workforce as if their clerks didn't depend on their pay checks for anything essential, such as rent or child support. Instead, retail and service employers tend to view their employees as children: students looking for summer jobs, spending money or a quick stopover on the road to a more fulfilling and better-paying career. These are great jobs, in other words, for people who don't really need them. And so the mall and the superstore have given birth to a ballooning subcategory of joke jobs —the frozen-yogurt jerk, the Orange Julius juicer, the Gap greeter, the Prozac happy Wal-Mart "sales associate" — that are notoriously unstable, low-paying and overwhelmingly part time. What is distressing about this trend is that over the past two decades, the relative importance of the service sector as a source of jobs has soared. The decline in manufacturing, as well as the waves of downsizing and cutbacks in the public sector, have been met by dramatic growth in the numbers of service sector jobs to the extent that services and retail now account for 75 percent of total U.S. employment. Today, there are four and a half times as many Americans selling clothes in specialty and department stores as there are workers stitching and weaving them, and Wal-Mart isn't just the biggest retailer in the world, it is also the largest private employer in the United States. And yet despite these shifts in employment patterns, most brand-name retail, service and restaurant chains have opted to put on economic blinders, insisting that they are still offering hobby jobs for kids. Never mind that the service sector is now filled with workers who have multiple university degrees, immigrants unable to find manufacturing jobs, laid-off nurses and teachers, and downsized middle managers. Never mind, too, that the students who do work in retail and fast food — as many of them do - are facing higher tuition costs, less financial assistance from parents and government and more years in school. Never mind that the food service workforce has been steadily aging over the last decade so that more than half are now over twenty five years old. Or that a 1997 study found that 25 percent of non-management Canadian retail workers had been with the same company for eleven years or more and that 39 percent had been there for between four and ten years. That's a lot longer than "Chainsaw" Al Dunlap lasted as CEO of Sunbeam Corp. But never mind all that. Everyone knows that a job in the service sector is a hobby, and retail is a place where people go for "experience," not a livelihood.”

Asta li s-a intamplat celor din retalil care n-au fost sindicalizatzi

Asta li se coace acu celor din manufacturing dupa ce vor fi inchise fabrcile sindicalizate .
Da ghici ce porcia nu tzine la infinit . America e in ca o tzra ~ libra asa cum afost ea dintotdeuna si cine intinde coarda pre tara risca sa o ia rau de tot in bot . Si daca vorba vostra asta e diferentza costuriel responsabiltazii sociale
“Cei $1500 sint de fapt suma cu care GM depaseste pe Toyota in costuri sociale. ”

Iar solutzia nu cred ca este ca SINDICATELE oameni sa inghita galusca si sa stranga curea renutzand la pensii si asigurari medicale pentru ca unii oameni pot fi prostitzi de foame frica si inconstientza sa o faca intorcan astfel roata istorie care epoca baronilor hotzieii.

Oricand e inca posibil; sa “slap the greedy bastards with a punishing tax for social irresponsibility”

Ca de accord free world free commerce da nu pe spinarea pensei mele si nici a asigurarii mele medicale . PUNCT.

Daca pensiile trag greu in balantza contabila a unora si deloc in a altora solutzia nu e da-le dracului de pensii .
Daca asigurarile medicale trag greu in balantza contabila a unora si deloc in a altora solutzia nu e da-I fracului daca se imbolnavesc la cimitir cu ei si angajam altzii ca avem de unde.

Tot asa duap cum pe teren la meci daca unii fauteaza si altzii nu daca unii se dopeaza si altzii solutzia nu sa itzi razi in barba si sa spui asa le trebuie daca’s prosti si n-o fac asa le trebuei n-au decat sa piarda .

VOI SINCER CREDETZI CA E RESPONSABIL SA AFIRMI CA FIRMELE TREBUIE SA FIE PENALIZATE CU FALIMETUL PENTRU CA PLATESC PENSII SI SPITAL ACOLO UNDE STATUL IN IRESPONSABILITATEA LUI REFUZA SA O FACA ?

Daca da atunci nu prea mai avem ce discuta .

E cam lung comentariul d-tale, dar sper ca i-am prins esenta.
Am o intrebare:

sintem intr-o economie eminamente de piata, asa ca in SUA.
GM (e un exemplu) nu isi poate vinde produsele pentru ca sint mai scumpe cu $1500 (pe bucata) decit ale competitiei. Cum am mai explicat, prefer sa cumpar o Toyota care la performante egale costa mai putin (economie de piata....iti aduci aminte?)


Cum GM nu mai vinde, nu mai are bani sa-ti plateasca pensia d-tale.
Ce propui????

Poti sa-ti rogi guvernul sa OBLIGE Toyota sa plateasca aceleasi beneficii ca GM.
Poti sa ceri guvernului sa nu accepte decit companii americane pe piata americana. Poti sa ceri guvernului sa te plateasca din bugetul national...poti sa ceri tot ce-ti trece prin minte.
Din fericire asta e inca o tara democratica cu o intelegere medie a economiei de piata mai dezvoltata decit in majoritatea tarilor dezvoltate.
Daca media alegatorului are opinii diferite de ale d-tale....mult noroc data viitoare



La 2009-04-02 06:34:40, laur a scris:

> Si de aceea pensile trebuie sa fie de stat si nu o capusa sindicala pe
> intreprinderile destul de mari si de nefericit pozitionate astfel
> incat sa nu se poata ascunde de ele
>
> De ce ? Pentru ca in focul luptei everything goes
>
> In focul luptei un tax break oferit de stat ca sa atraga BMW este
> platit prin inchiderea unei fabrici intr-un stat care nu isi permite
> sa acorde o asemenea pleasca
>
> In focul luptei un agreement anti-sindical si o decuplare de la plata
> pensiilor a unora insemna pur si simplu falimentarea intreprinderilor
> destul de vechi ca asa apuce sa produca si pensionari .
>
> Adica sa fim clari daca voi alegetzi sa falimentatzi GM si Chrysler
> pentru ca ele platesc pensii cata vremne Toyoata , BMW, Honda si
> Nissan nu cred ca sustzinetzi un model economic vaibil .
>
> Adica pe termen mediu si intr-o maniera revolutzionar /
> insurectzionara adica tipic luptei de clasa comuniste voi instigatzi
> ca fortzel ce au pus capastru sindical industrie auto americane sa
> procedeze similar cu industria auto straina si in general cu toata
> TOATA economia americana
>
> Adica voi credetzi ca nu se mai poate naste o noua miscare
> roosveldiana care sa dea cu baronii furtului de Wall-Mart & co de
> pamant ?
>
> Voi chiar credati ca ce-a mancat lupul e bun mancat si ce-a prostit
> propaganda asta vorba lui Alamar “...inelectuala si
> morala” e bun prostit . ca oadata instaurata dicataura lui
> “NO SPACE, NO CHOICE, NO JOBS” lumpenii nu se poate trezi
> si nu poate riposta cu NO LOGO asa cun fac deja in mo symbolic d
> ever-o 20 de ani incoace de la batalia de la Settle ?”
>
> Eu nu cred eu nu cred ca mantra corporatziilr de azi o asa ma faca
> multa vreme purici “Branded Work: Hobbies, Not Jobs”
>
> “Most of the large employers in the service sector manage their
> workforce as if their clerks didn't depend on their pay checks for
> anything essential, such as rent or child support. Instead, retail
> and service employers tend to view their employees as children:
> students looking for summer jobs, spending money or a quick stopover
> on the road to a more fulfilling and better-paying career. These are
> great jobs, in other words, for people who don't really need them.
> And so the mall and the superstore have given birth to a ballooning
> subcategory of joke jobs —the frozen-yogurt jerk, the Orange
> Julius juicer, the Gap greeter, the Prozac happy Wal-Mart "sales
> associate" — that are notoriously unstable, low-paying and
> overwhelmingly part time. What is distressing about this trend is
> that over the past two decades, the relative importance of the
> service sector as a source of jobs has soared. The decline in
> manufacturing, as well as the waves of downsizing and cutbacks in the
> public sector, have been met by dramatic growth in the numbers of
> service sector jobs to the extent that services and retail now
> account for 75 percent of total U.S. employment. Today, there are
> four and a half times as many Americans selling clothes in specialty
> and department stores as there are workers stitching and weaving
> them, and Wal-Mart isn't just the biggest retailer in the world, it
> is also the largest private employer in the United States. And yet
> despite these shifts in employment patterns, most brand-name retail,
> service and restaurant chains have opted to put on economic blinders,
> insisting that they are still offering hobby jobs for kids. Never mind
> that the service sector is now filled with workers who have multiple
> university degrees, immigrants unable to find manufacturing jobs,
> laid-off nurses and teachers, and downsized middle managers. Never
> mind, too, that the students who do work in retail and fast food
> — as many of them do - are facing higher tuition costs, less
> financial assistance from parents and government and more years in
> school. Never mind that the food service workforce has been steadily
> aging over the last decade so that more than half are now over twenty
> five years old. Or that a 1997 study found that 25 percent of
> non-management Canadian retail workers had been with the same company
> for eleven years or more and that 39 percent had been there for
> between four and ten years. That's a lot longer than "Chainsaw" Al
> Dunlap lasted as CEO of Sunbeam Corp. But never mind all that.
> Everyone knows that a job in the service sector is a hobby, and
> retail is a place where people go for "experience," not a
> livelihood.”
>
> Asta li s-a intamplat celor din retalil care n-au fost sindicalizatzi
>
>
> Asta li se coace acu celor din manufacturing dupa ce vor fi inchise
> fabrcile sindicalizate .
> Da ghici ce porcia nu tzine la infinit . America e in ca o tzra ~
> libra asa cum afost ea dintotdeuna si cine intinde coarda pre tara
> risca sa o ia rau de tot in bot . Si daca vorba vostra asta e
> diferentza costuriel responsabiltazii sociale
> “Cei $1500 sint de fapt suma cu care GM depaseste pe Toyota in
> costuri sociale. ”
>
> Iar solutzia nu cred ca este ca SINDICATELE oameni sa inghita galusca
> si sa stranga curea renutzand la pensii si asigurari medicale pentru
> ca unii oameni pot fi prostitzi de foame frica si inconstientza sa o
> faca intorcan astfel roata istorie care epoca baronilor hotzieii.
>
> Oricand e inca posibil; sa “slap the greedy bastards with a
> punishing tax for social irresponsibility”
>
> Ca de accord free world free commerce da nu pe spinarea pensei mele si
> nici a asigurarii mele medicale . PUNCT.
>
> Daca pensiile trag greu in balantza contabila a unora si deloc in a
> altora solutzia nu e da-le dracului de pensii .
> Daca asigurarile medicale trag greu in balantza contabila a unora si
> deloc in a altora solutzia nu e da-I fracului daca se imbolnavesc la
> cimitir cu ei si angajam altzii ca avem de unde.
>
> Tot asa duap cum pe teren la meci daca unii fauteaza si altzii nu daca
> unii se dopeaza si altzii solutzia nu sa itzi razi in barba si sa
> spui asa le trebuie daca’s prosti si n-o fac asa le trebuei
> n-au decat sa piarda .
>
> VOI SINCER CREDETZI CA E RESPONSABIL SA AFIRMI CA FIRMELE TREBUIE SA
> FIE PENALIZATE CU FALIMETUL PENTRU CA PLATESC PENSII SI SPITAL ACOLO
> UNDE STATUL IN IRESPONSABILITATEA LUI REFUZA SA O FACA ?
>
> Daca da atunci nu prea mai avem ce discuta .
>