Cultura

insa el doar continua ideea cu care multi teologii crestini sint deja de acord, ... si anume ca Evanghelistii au minimizat responsabilitatea autoritatii romanilor in condamnarea lui Iisus din Nazaret ...

<<Haim Cohn, an expert in the history of Jewish legal traditions, argues that not only did the Jews have no part in the trial of Christ, but also that the Sanhedrin, Judaism`s high court, actually tried to save him from death.

Analyzing the Gospel accounts of the Passion in the light of known facts about legal customs and traditions of Jesus` time, ...
Cohn insists that Jesus was tried and condemned for the political crime of insurrection, ... a charge that could be handled only by the Roman Procurator and not by a Jewish court.

The Justice supports this suggestion by reference to the Gospel texts: when Jesus was asked by Pilate if he was King of the Jews, he answered ``You have said so`` in effect, says Cohn, a nolo contendere admission of guilt...

In Cohn`s reconstruction of the events, the Sanhedrin first examined witnesses not to condemn Christ but to find men who would convincingly testify in his favor before the Romans. When it could find none, the high court attempted to persuade Jesus to plead not guilty before the Romans... He refused.

The buffeting that Matthew says Jesus received from Sanhedrin members was thus not punishment for blasphemy but simply the product of bitter frustration. ``Jesus had refused to cooperate and to bow to their authority,`` says Cohn, ``and there was nothing that could be done to prevent the trial from taking its course.``
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,837540,00.html

nu cred ca te poti baza pe punctul de vedere al unui rabin privind religia crestina... si daca te bazezi totusi, ar trebui sa emigrezi la tel-aviv... poate ti-ar place sa omori si niste palestinieni.... bon chance!..

zice-se, 30 de ani ... daca pricep corect articolul de mai jos, unde este citat Haim Cohn:

http://www.adevarul.ro/articole/2007/mantuitorul-achitat-in-reconstituiri-ale-procesului.html

PS Am vazut un comentariu acolo in legatura cu 48 de evanghelii si cum ca au fost alese doar patru. Sa fiu sincer sunt dezamagit ca au fost numai 48 de evanghelii, ar fi trebuit sa fie mii. Oamenii care L-au intalnit, care au fost vindecati, inviati din morti, care au fost martori nenumaratelor minuni facute de Iisus, fiecare ar fi fost tentat sa noteze experienta sa: Lazar cel inviat, Iair mai marele sinagogii din Capernaum, Corneliu sutasul, chiar Pilat, etc, etc.

Daca este sa le numim apocrife, scrierile ar trebui sa fie extrem de multe. Asa cum continua si in ziua de astazi ... cu cei care L-au intalnit in mod real pe Iisus, iar aceasta intalnire le-a rezolvat orice necredinta.

Asa s-a intamplat de ex. cu Antonie Bloom, un jumate de evreu rus (asa cred eu din ce-am citit). O intalnire pe cat de neasteptata si brusca, pe atat de completa in urmarile ei, caci chirurgul se calugareste si mai apoi ajunge mitropolit al Surojului.

Fiecare om care deschide ochii in lumina lui Iisus simte nevoia sa spuna lumii intregi ce s-a petrecut cu el.

http://www.carteaortodoxa.ro/2008/05/21/despre-intalnirea-cu-dumnezeu-antonie-bloom/

http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/holocaust.htm

La 2008-11-18 04:36:34, briel a scris:
> zice-se, 30 de ani ... daca pricep corect articolul de mai jos, unde este citat Haim Cohn:
> http://www.adevarul.ro/articole/2007/mantuitorul-achitat-in-reconstituiri-ale-procesului.html

La 2008-11-18 05:57:21, NormanFinkel5 a scris:

> http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/holocaust.htm
>

urma am cautat Naturei Karta sa vad ce-i cu ei si cat de multi sunt.
... ??? ...
Capitolul "Theodor Hertzel" m-a dat gata. Ce oameni !

Preda ereticii justitiei temporare cu recomandarea sa nu faca varsare de sange.
Inchiztia sireaca de ea nu avea nici o vina. Dimpotriva recomada sa nu s efaca varsare de sange. Nu avea nici o vina ca oamenii nu e ignifugi, nu?