Cultura

Acad. Simionescu incheie: "eleva lui Rabindranah Tagore, neintelegand legile romanului" [...]

Greu de crezut ca o intelectuala sa confunde documentarul cu fictiunea,.Mai mult, ca indianoloaga, precis stia de tiza sa Maytreyi, adevarata muza a lui Eliade

vide wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maitreyi

"Maitreyi was a vedic philosopher from ancient India. She was the second wife of famous sage and philosopher, Yajnavalkya, the first being Katyaayanee.[1]

[...]
According to legend, Maitreyi really did not want to marry Yajnavalkya, but she wanted to live with him as his disciple and a spiritual companion to do sadhana or spiritual development. She went to Yajnavalkya's wife, Katyaayanee and expressed her desire to live with her husband, and with Katyaayanee's consent, she became his companion.[1] "

Suna familiar ptr. cititorii romanului Maytreyi, nu? Cum se face ca fiica profului nu a sesizat asemanarea? Eu cred ca a remarcat-o all right, dar s-a temut ca cititori neavizati ar putea trece cu vederea "confuzia" intre sine si celebra filosoafa, asa ca a preferat sa faca valuri de pe pozitia "victimei", in loc sa se bata cu pumnul in piept. E posibil ca nu a facut-o intentionat, dar e clara dorinta-i exhibitionista, cat o fi ea de indianca pudica si de casta superioara. Ca daca tacea... trecea neobservata, dar asa, a intrat in nemurire.